is positive here is no manure used. What to do with her? 
plays in Dassow the Building Code probably does not matter. 
A huge relationships Dassower for industrial plant (4.65 MW) or 4 small plants (500 MW)? that is the question ... 
Who pays the costs the investment? the taxpayer who pays the 
The discussion of city officials: instead of 648 is the number of residents who oppose the location of the BGA, reduced to 600. Then it does not matter whether or why they are against the project. Mr. Blanchard (according to the newspaper with his own opinion) agrees with the opinion of Mr. Ober. Man (men's) has dealt so intensively with the arguments was (always for the project, ran for the operator always started right away) and just closes his eyes and sees no more arguments that speak against a BGA (increased traffic, odor, noise, risks, rising prices for energy and food ... the smells of nepotism). Own arguments, as no more manure transport, have been refuted. "Therefore, the manure hit by the stables" Who has the operator in control? Until now, sewage sludge, where he was also intended to give no more. Should he be fermented with? The operator 
Please click the below comment and announce evtuell his own opinion. 
influence to attack the city representatives. 
In this blog You can find independent reports of nepali and german journalists about a school project in the hills above Pokhara, Nepal, 
which was initiated by german mountain biker Markus Alexander Woessner after a fatal airplane crash on August 22nd, 2002 (Shangri-La Air) near the site of the school. 
This photo of the school, I had on 12 Made in July 2008. A total of more than € 10000.00 Donate - Handed over to the idle and corrupt Schulkommitee - against my urgent advice. The existing building is made of cheap materials, no wall is plastered, the floor is cold and bare, the Schulbaenke old and worn, there is no second floor - how to clear here in the photo looks, etc, - ((- The Gedenkchoerten for the Crash victims of the Hauser Excursions tour group - on the very left -. scruffy and is not maintained 
Unfortunately, our demands have not been printed. Click to read the letter to the 2 Opinion.> 
K. family Pierstorf
In committee meetings to projects in Pötenitz and Rose Hagen advised about it, it plays no role in Dassow? Why is the problem here is checked off as quickly and easily?
How does the construction and operation of the biogas plant with these animals? Halls will be closed and the constant noise 90-125 dB (A)? Who implements the monitor ring? Where is the faunistic survey that will be submitted later?
like is in the forecast of noise ArevaGmbH Bremen "Bioenergy Dassow"
by LMS MV / SH GmbH
S. 33 promised restrictions: no night ensiling, maximum permissible sound power level of the exhaust gas fireplaces LW = 91 dB (A), are consistent night driving traffic to the preload , no operation of the dryer at night (also on page 41 and p. 42) should be but then just done the 6.00 clock?
There is constant talk of healthy housing and living conditions. Legally, they are seen well kept, but for well-being of the citizens and the tourism Although scanty, but there is (Peters crest mug, family hunger, Stork's Nest, etc.) are not suitable. We call for: On Sundays and public holidays ensiling and drying or transportation to begin at 08.00 clock! Here, the Tourist Office (Room, Hotel, Catering are probably low or set (see Peters crest mug, which can even now permanently close, brings with it not enough tax).
According noise opinion is not a nuisance to be expected. But if a Motorcycle goes up full, then the 90 dB (A). I can hear from my property such motorcycles already 2-3 miles, that is, the sounds of vehicles and equipment, ie, several are also just as loud and partly constantly. The leads to a permanent nuisance. Those of you who would like to stand it?
Why are the data updated? Of which was in the city representatives meeting on 28.05.2008 the question. See (justification for statutes p. 66, 67 and 69 Unchanged version and located in the interpretation adopted Version p. 69, 70 and 72! Was originally a "ruderal perennials hallway ... 2376 and a total area equivalent 1425.60 3185.20 "expected and after the decision, the data show a change of " ruderal perennials hallway ... 713 and an area equivalent 427.80 Total 2187.40 "This is changing (p.67 and 70) of the total value of any specialized area of 29335.83 to 28338.03 and this result embellishes the overall balance p. 69 and 72 Who has prompted why this change? Why this happened after the town meeting representatives? What is to be effected?
It seems rather as leverage to enforce use of the project.
also expected to be good data and well spoken. At the first meeting in Peter's arms Rekittke Mr. Krug said of max. 12 trips per month more will do it for me 144 more trips per year.
Current actual state 10 638 difference
and biogas plant (4.65 MW) 11 830 1192
Maximum duty (6, 2 MW) 12 407 1769
Über1700 more a year to 144 announced. The difference is
loud noise and traffic forecasting system 6 it 6-harvest periods, and not as to the information meeting at 2:07:08 raised four harvest periods.
Why can not the farmer before the decision silage stocks (corn, chopped straw ? ...) create? Does he know more? Where he gets the certainty of a positive commitment that he has building materials (gravel, etc.) stored?
is in such bad work of the same group of experts really be considered a serious prognosis?
We demand the silage in a warehouse to store, then the cover can not be forgotten.
First citizens are feeling the effects of the biogas plant on, potential buyers from jumping from the sale of land (Mr. Hunger, Women Amerdingen) or make the construction project (building lot between S. Garbe and family Ryll) that when they learned that the biogas plant will be built.
What do these companies? Areva Bioenergy GmbH
- that the operators are planning
Biogas AG?
Dassow Biomass Energy (p. 15), the new operating company, who is behind it?
=> Now, a successor comes from the Ruhr coal AG = New Energies to build the really large in dimensions, or is all about give or sell and it remains as a farmer, a supplier with guaranteed loss?
If the premises are sold, it can be amortized for 20 years.
The technical investment as well (shorter term). The sample calculation of Mr. Blanchard estimated about 25,000 € income is a catch, because since 2008, the trade tax base rate for corporations is not more than 5% but only 3%. That makes a total of 2 / 5 less revenue.
The first phase of construction by 2008 of 3 modules, Gärrestverarbeitung,
second phase earlier than 2014/15 to 2010/11, ie money and
then should not the "... complete renovation of the agricultural fleet ..." . Done Plant response to our letter by Mr. Blanchard Item 8 request to 4
"We are against the plant at that location!" that they take in the urban contract and in the B-Plan,
We no longer have the impression that here with objective to do to have views and to remind once again of the article in the LN of 2:09:05 opinion of Mr Mews regarding Renaturisierung Pötenitzer of coastal flooding Moores (see Appendix!).
The statements that are it a city representative did not matter whether 60 or 600 people on the other hand and they have no obvious arguments for him, I want to leave Sun
Or are you irritated expresses: Why have people from Pötenitz, Bare Village, etc., signed the're not Dassower? Their elected representatives agree with, but from here.
letters are not answered or not too seriously. If one fears and concerns of citizens with the question: "How do they define ...?" or guarantee the breakdowns and accidents in the mentioned BGA's replied that it is other technical installations to be built than that. Explain to us the technical differences of these other BGA's and prove that this can not happen!
Refusing letters to answer directed personally to the ("... I can not force any letters to write ..."), show me just how we seriously citizens are taken in reality and what we mean by civic responsibility.
far were our questions and needs addressed only superficially, hardly answered (especially not in writing, as it was desirable and actually heard binding ) and promised tasks are not completed or finally even denied.
Where is the promised benefits and disadvantages balance the city Dassow?
If one accepts our arguments not themselves and not be called effective ... or disprove can not decide how can one then?
How do the politicians want to burn food, the safety of citizens?
It gives the impression that You have made a decision long ago and are in favor of this project.
please remember that in the event of an accident or other consequences, fill with your choice of this object is a shared responsibility and leave it to investors and operators.
After a period of four weeks, we only received a response from Mr. Blanchard.
community of interest "for Dassow Dassow, Dassow 23 942
personally for the attention of city officials , 25 May 2008
Dear Mr / Ms ...,
the city representatives have on the city Dassow on its 14th session November 2007 the decision on the establishment of the development plan No. 22 for the construction of a biogas plant in Kaltenhof and in connection with which the 5th Changing the land use plan adopted unanimously, thus laying the foundation for the construction of this facility.
We appeal to you today with the request that the final decision regarding the approval of the construction of the biogas facility at the to meet the family in Rekittke Brennereiweg 19 for the most accurate weighing all the pros and cons for the residents of adjacent districts and the entire city Dassow.
with their signatures have been 595 residents of the city and the surrounding districts Dassow against the location of the biogas plant in Kaltenhof pronounced. The are nearly 600 of your constituents! We believe that the disadvantages resulting from a biogas plant in the immediate environment, the benefits to the city far outweigh Dassow. We see significant disadvantages in the following points in this regard and ask for detailed written response our questions:
first nature and the environment
a.) Will there be a regular emission of methane into the atmosphere? How much will this be by a biogas plant of the proposed order? How does this affect the environment on the one hand, and also to the residents of the immediate environment? Who can guarantee that the permanent gases escaping to the health of the population, especially our children at risk?
b.) If can prevent the development of a monoculture in the fields?
c.) If the operator access to an increased use of chemicals or even to gene-
manipulated material to keep the income is stable or improving ?
Even though there are legal requirements to be complied with, we doubt the
regular review and therefore ask: who controls it and how often does the
done according to the law?
d.) what extent will it cause an impairment of ground water and thus the Dassower lake, which is protected? Can this with the fact that Dassow is drinking water catchment, agree?
second economy
a.) If you realize that the resulting business taxes, with which a provider like
for his project promotes, the city will be available earlier than in five years time?
What will be the exact height of the expected business taxes?
How does the eventual extension of the biogas plant on the payment of
business taxes for the city Dassow?
Can you guarantee that the system even after a period of five years
still exists? In this regard, the city has surely done enough experience ...
b.) are occupied, the (five?) Resulting jobs with experts from the
environment ?
c.) The operator will also be promoting the sale of the residual heat generated. Are you aware
just this in Vorwerk Kaltenhof or not found?
is d.) Nine have already arisen and eleven is under planning biogas plants are cur-
tan in the district of North West Mecklenburg, which run a considerable need for on-
construction areas or required field returns. Will lead to higher prices for ever less domestic agricultural products entering the market on ?
third Tourism
a.) The city Dassow advertises for a nature-based tourism, many residents run restaurants, guest houses, holiday homes and apartments (in some cases their livelihoods )
in Kaltenhof and Vorwerk. Have you considered that in the course of the construction of a
biogas plant a huge decline in Visitors will come? If
potential investors for tourism-oriented projects, such as for the memory
possibly fail?
b.) can you guarantee that it despite closed system does not lead to unpleasant odors?
c.) What impact the - by the biogas plant-related - increasing heavy traffic that is largely run on the road Klützer, contribute to the baths in the direction of traffic Bolton?
4th traffic
a.) A renewal of the fleet of the operator means an increase in the trailer to 9t gerlast each vehicle plus tractor. To what extent is the increase of the weight of the vehicles on the roads, ways which are considered as access roads impact, particularly that of the non-developed part of the distillery road, if there as vehicle to increase by 12 per month (average)? Will there also be no additional shipments of manure by Kaltenhof and Vorwerk?
5th housing quality
a.) Can you guarantee that there will be no odor nuisance come by silage and manure storage shipments will?
b.) Can you guarantee that there is no further noise from increased traffic, particularly in the Klützer street, in the cold Höfer way in Brennereiweg in Hinterweg, Travemünde Come away, and all other streets and roads in the districts and Kaltenhof Vorwerk?
c.) Are you aware of the growing potential danger for the residents (and their homes and land), pedestrians, cyclists and our children through serious and more widespread on agricultural vehicles that travel through our neighborhoods aware of? We see in particular the safety of our children are already extremely vulnerable, they must use on their way to school such as Brennereiweg a sunken sidewalk, the roadway may be used for any vehicles as
. What happens if the number of passages increased? you like to send your children every day with the idea to school, it runs on a track, although it uses a sidewalk?
d.) can you guarantee that results from a biogas plant in the immediate vicinity not reduce the financial value of land and homes? What effect does a biogas plant in the immediate vicinity of the unit value (and therefore on property taxes paid by each owner)?
e.) can you exclude a significant reduction in recreational value on your property ?
f.) Can you rule out dangers that may emanate from the biogas plant (including danger of explosion), and for all? In the recent past, it has several accidents, fires, gas explosions and accidents, where, as at 08 November 2005 near the town of Zeven / Lower Saxony (4 dead, 1 seriously injured and 10 firefighters injured by gas accident), 10 January 2006 Schlettau / Erzgebirge (slurry accident, flooding the streets and adjoining farms, four days after the ground was still full of feces), 16 December 2007 Riedlingen / Baden-Württemberg (Level of damage: one million euros, slurry rain and flying debris over several hundred meters, cause unclear), 21 May 2008 Kogel / Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (fire in biogas plant and evacuation of 20 employees because of explosion risk, the use of 120 firefighters, likely cause of breakdowns).
Who comes in such a case, for any damage to your house, yard and life, and who has the burden of proof? If the operators take responsibility in this respect to its neighbors (of adequate insurance coverage)?
to further illustrate the above points is to give you a copy of the information sheet. For more information, please visit our website at: http://dassowerfuerdassow.blogspot.com
We are happy in a personal conversation in order to resolve any arising questions and problems. Please contact us - we can be reached at the below contact details - or send us an e-mail at
