Do You Wear Socks With Low Converse

The project manager, Mark Alexander Woessner (Chiemgau biking), should the occasion of his confidant on the ground in Pokhara, Bhai Krishna Khadka (Hauser Excursions - http:// www.hauser-exkursionen.de/allgemein/newsocialenglishschool.html ) to be informed in detail about it, that the Executive Board of the New School in Social English Kristi Ward 2, wants Harrabot in the next few months, no further financial contributions to the Schulkommittee . The SchuelerInnenzahl has fallen to less than 80. Four teachers have acknowledged in June from teaching!

According to the school management other donations should be accumulated up to 2009 in Germany, then in the swinging expansion of the school (second floor) and now give priority to continue to solve the problems with the currently inactive and completely disinterested Schulkommittee sustainable.

This applies also for the other € 2500.00, the Dr. Claus handed over makers of the more than questionable Foundation dentists without borders "/" Dentistry Without Limits ". As long as they should not be handed over to the opinion of the entire Schulkommittee these prices until the question of LehrerInnengehaelter is settled satisfactorily.

This photo of the school, I had on 12 Made in July 2008. A total of more than € 10000.00 Donate - Handed over to the idle and corrupt Schulkommitee - against my urgent advice. The existing building is made of cheap materials, no wall is plastered, the floor is cold and bare, the Schulbaenke old and worn, there is no second floor - how to clear here in the photo looks, etc, - ((- The Gedenkchoerten for the Crash victims of the Hauser Excursions tour group - on the very left -. scruffy and is not maintained

International development cooperation is not just that as a good person (for the the Nuremberg Orthodontic Dr. Claus-maker holds) every now and then a sack of money in Nepal drops!

background is that the eleven-member Schulkommittee (including ten from derSubedi family) poor and inadequate work. In terms of school grades is the power of the committee including the Chairman Mitra Lal Subedi 5-6!

be since school principal Dharma Datta Bandari and the whole of these prices paid for many months under drastically, so that her salary, given the increased cost of living no longer to meet the daily needs enough! I've helped out the school principal so repeated interest-free small loans. By voeruebergehende Zuerueckhalten of grants to gentle pressure was exerted on the Schulkommittee. On the school account are sufficient resources to pay these prices to be appropriate.

Several teachers who are serious about the thought of leaving the school when the question of the appropriate payment is not until next school year, that in about three weeks (Baisakh, April 14, 2008) starts is controlled.

The SchuelerInnenzahlen are declining, because the quality of teaching strongly subsides, etc. also, because of these prices unmotivated, given the miserable pay. In the possession of Bhai Krishna Karki located and the project manager Woessner for teacher training provided for 750,00 Euro (including 550.00 € Sabrina Knoll, dentists in Haubrich Forum Koeln) should be immediately handed over to the teachers directly or to the educational institution be. A need for English and computer courses and computer and printers.

Likewise, project managers should urgently seek to ensure that the New School of Social English in a private school in a community school or a registered association (trust, Nepali: Ghuti) is converted. The school is currently for tax purposes as a commercial enterprise led (which they de facto, with annual sales of more than 6,000.00 EUR is currently, too) and must pay 30 percent of each donation tax to the government. To that extent the public statement of the project manager Woessner compared to donors that "100 percent of donations" is central to the school project and the children benefit from Kristi misleading.

should also be excited by the project, the Schulkommittee representative of families living in the city (not just the Subedis) to occupy.

Brazilian Waxed Celebs

delivery at 08:07:08 in OZ on 09.07.08


Unfortunately, our demands have not been printed. Click to read the letter to the 2 Opinion.>

Images Breastfeeding Husband

end of the interpretation on 09.07.08

Today, my wife M. Pierstorf, Mrs. B. Schulte and me in Schoenberg, the second to last day of our remaining signatures (now 648 registered voter, about 1 / 5) against the location of the biogas plant and leave the opinions on interpretation and opinion. The were 19 opinions from citizens of Dassow, either to the location or even oppose a biogas plant. Unfortunately, someone had passed this evening will bring his opinion yet. She promised to create the tomorrow morning, even after Schoenberg. I was wondering what other opinions independently of us received in office.
we now get serious answers?
count of its citizens and will-nothing?
We will monitor in any case, what it means to exercise in democracy Dassow!
MfG K. Pierstorf

Is Milena Velba Gallery

These and similar, perhaps better opinion on the interpretation of the B- Plan No. 22 Creation of a biogas plant Dassow were now well on

K. family Pierstorf

Subject: opinion on the interpretation of the B-Plan No. 22

From: the ground the 5th Change of land use plan of the city Dassow in connection with the preparation of the Plan B No 22

first On p. 17 is that Dassow in the tourism development program, a tourist focal point, and the priority areas: nature reserves include "Coastline" Harkenbekniederung shore zone Dassower See it. is
In committee meetings to projects in Pötenitz and Rose Hagen advised about it, it plays no role in Dassow? Why is the problem here is checked off as quickly and easily?
second As can be seen on p. 20 concerning the country's tourism / tourism but of "... lower for people recreational value to speak ... "? Are we who live here and live here then move away? Why are the "... for nesting swallows and bats quarter for medium to high potential animals (first) before people ... " (in 3rd place) above.
How does the construction and operation of the biogas plant with these animals? Halls will be closed and the constant noise 90-125 dB (A)? Who implements the monitor ring? Where is the faunistic survey that will be submitted later?

The Statute of the development plan No. 22
third On page 3 noise control measures are mentioned: 22.00 - 06.00 clock no silage or vehicle traffic during this time. Who is this by and behaves like this with the bias of the farm? Who can distinguish? If vehicles are returned at night or in the park then the penny?
like is in the forecast of noise ArevaGmbH Bremen "Bioenergy Dassow"
by LMS MV / SH GmbH
S. 33 promised restrictions: no night ensiling, maximum permissible sound power level of the exhaust gas fireplaces LW = 91 dB (A), are consistent night driving traffic to the preload , no operation of the dryer at night (also on page 41 and p. 42) should be but then just done the 6.00 clock?
There is constant talk of healthy housing and living conditions. Legally, they are seen well kept, but for well-being of the citizens and the tourism Although scanty, but there is (Peters crest mug, family hunger, Stork's Nest, etc.) are not suitable. We call for: On Sundays and public holidays ensiling and drying or transportation to begin at 08.00 clock! Here, the Tourist Office (Room, Hotel, Catering are probably low or set (see Peters crest mug, which can even now permanently close, brings with it not enough tax).
According noise opinion is not a nuisance to be expected. But if a Motorcycle goes up full, then the 90 dB (A). I can hear from my property such motorcycles already 2-3 miles, that is, the sounds of vehicles and equipment, ie, several are also just as loud and partly constantly. The leads to a permanent nuisance. Those of you who would like to stand it?
fourth who actually has the Trees at the junction of cold Weg Brennereiweg (South) away and for what purpose? If the construction of the road, who ordered the / approved?
5th To be carried out according to p. 57 of compensation or the compensation of the impervious surfaces in Selmsdorf. Why not in Dassow? What has the city (municipality) of it? Projects like the park, the swimming pool or sports field, etc. but would also be suitable for this right?
Why are the data updated? Of which was in the city representatives meeting on 28.05.2008 the question. See (justification for statutes p. 66, 67 and 69 Unchanged version and located in the interpretation adopted Version p. 69, 70 and 72! Was originally a "ruderal perennials hallway ... 2376 and a total area equivalent 1425.60 3185.20 "expected and after the decision, the data show a change of " ruderal perennials hallway ... 713 and an area equivalent 427.80 Total 2187.40 "This is changing (p.67 and 70) of the total value of any specialized area of 29335.83 to 28338.03 and this result embellishes the overall balance p. 69 and 72 Who has prompted why this change? Why this happened after the town meeting representatives? What is to be effected?
6th The farmer shows contradictory. On the one hand, produces Agricultural too much, can not settle it, it must set aside under plow, etc. on the other hand he wants to step up, creating major traffic problems. P. 69 "... arable land would continue to be used for agriculture. Without implementation of the plan is likely that the use of agricultural plant would be intensified. The existing infrastructure and the technical noise problems would possibly tightening fen. ... occur without the construction of the biogas plant to an increase in traffic to the farm would be. "
It seems rather as leverage to enforce use of the project.
also expected to be good data and well spoken. At the first meeting in Peter's arms Rekittke Mr. Krug said of max. 12 trips per month more will do it for me 144 more trips per year.
Current actual state 10 638 difference

and biogas plant (4.65 MW) 11 830 1192

Maximum duty (6, 2 MW) 12 407 1769

Über1700 more a year to 144 announced. The difference is
loud noise and traffic forecasting system 6 it 6-harvest periods, and not as to the information meeting at 2:07:08 raised four harvest periods.
Why can not the farmer before the decision silage stocks (corn, chopped straw ? ...) create? Does he know more? Where he gets the certainty of a positive commitment that he has building materials (gravel, etc.) stored?
7th The studies we find an error. Both reports by the same company LMS MV / SH GmbH use the same text and different data. smell forecast ArevaGmbH Bremen "Bioenergy Dassow" by LMS MV / SH GmbH p.5 "... foreign-occupied residential buildings ... 130 to 150 m away ... "and the noise forecast ArevaGmbH Bremen " bioenergy Dassow " by LMS MV / SH GmbH p. 6 " ... foreign-occupied residential buildings located in about 35 meters west or about 30 meters southwest of the proposed System ... "
is in such bad work of the same group of experts really be considered a serious prognosis?
8th According to p. 12 min BIMSCH § 3 (1 +4) "... odors should be avoided ... 6th Smell is ... An odor hour ... "and p. 10 multiple system components can vary greatly serve as odor sources. It is promised that there will be no more smells, except when cut and the feed, during transport due to leaky containers (spills into the street )....
We demand the silage in a warehouse to store, then the cover can not be forgotten.
9.Wertminderung of plots:
First citizens are feeling the effects of the biogas plant on, potential buyers from jumping from the sale of land (Mr. Hunger, Women Amerdingen) or make the construction project (building lot between S. Garbe and family Ryll) that when they learned that the biogas plant will be built.
10th Why was so much secrecy, with the investor? If he has something to hide? Transparency? We've heard three names / read ... What should be kept secret?
What do these companies? Areva Bioenergy GmbH
- that the operators are planning
Biogas AG?
Dassow Biomass Energy (p. 15), the new operating company, who is behind it?
=> Now, a successor comes from the Ruhr coal AG = New Energies to build the really large in dimensions, or is all about give or sell and it remains as a farmer, a supplier with guaranteed loss?
11th Where are the faunistic survey and landscape plan? Why not lie with?
12th What the city and goes when?
If the premises are sold, it can be amortized for 20 years.
The technical investment as well (shorter term). The sample calculation of Mr. Blanchard estimated about 25,000 € income is a catch, because since 2008, the trade tax base rate for corporations is not more than 5% but only 3%. That makes a total of 2 / 5 less revenue.
The first phase of construction by 2008 of 3 modules, Gärrestverarbeitung,
second phase earlier than 2014/15 to 2010/11, ie money and
then should not the "... complete renovation of the agricultural fleet ..." . Done Plant response to our letter by Mr. Blanchard Item 8 request to 4

why we collectively in the event that they are against the vote of the citizens (now 632 votes) issue, opt for this facility and I stress

"We are against the plant at that location!" that they take in the urban contract and in the B-Plan,

1. that the streets ( southern access road, north ring) first be expanded , because otherwise the infrastructure and traffic problems too large, ie, bathing, agricultural and construction operations since Pötenitz is locked. Who sets the otherwise still stands by when the plant? If they are not removed, the operator moves on through the "protected" roads. We also call the area of Klützer Street (from junction Kaltenhofer way to the northern ring road) to Travemünde route and Brennereiweg for agricultural transport lock (smaller then the infrastructure problems) and thus the tonnage limit of 7.5 tonnes Brennereiweg (As promised in their own access roads for the biogas plant) and enforce Travemünde route and Hinterweg.

1. that citizens are protected by the really necessary insurance, ie a secured operating and asset liability with 100% "worst case" with the burden of proof (not that we in the event of an accident or damage have to prove where the damage occurs), a total protection of the legal framework also (not just minimum coverage)

3. We call these old buildings, if they are already used to isolate additional and silage (fresh bleed) in a warehouse to store (ie, it is always covered), then noise and odors. It should be noted that chicken manure may be used, but cover is (p. 7 Item 8 No.22 City Zoning Dassow).

1. We also call for the creation of surveys before and after the construction of the biogas plant and a value of lost compensation.

5. The future operator called a "Type and take ". If he can build his system, we want the compensation measures are also of the city or the surrounding area benefit Dassow and not anywhere ... (See above-mentioned projects and bike path!).

6. We call for: On Sundays and public holidays ensiling and drying or transportation to begin at 08.00 clock!
   

Finally, I have to criticize the behavior of some city officials.

We no longer have the impression that here with objective to do to have views and to remind once again of the article in the LN of 2:09:05 opinion of Mr Mews regarding Renaturisierung Pötenitzer of coastal flooding Moores (see Appendix!).
The statements that are it a city representative did not matter whether 60 or 600 people on the other hand and they have no obvious arguments for him, I want to leave Sun
Or are you irritated expresses: Why have people from Pötenitz, Bare Village, etc., signed the're not Dassower? Their elected representatives agree with, but from here.
letters are not answered or not too seriously. If one fears and concerns of citizens with the question: "How do they define ...?" or guarantee the breakdowns and accidents in the mentioned BGA's replied that it is other technical installations to be built than that. Explain to us the technical differences of these other BGA's and prove that this can not happen!
Refusing letters to answer directed personally to the ("... I can not force any letters to write ..."), show me just how we seriously citizens are taken in reality and what we mean by civic responsibility.
far were our questions and needs addressed only superficially, hardly answered (especially not in writing, as it was desirable and actually heard binding ) and promised tasks are not completed or finally even denied.
Where is the promised benefits and disadvantages balance the city Dassow?
If one accepts our arguments not themselves and not be called effective ... or disprove can not decide how can one then?
How do the politicians want to burn food, the safety of citizens?
It gives the impression that You have made a decision long ago and are in favor of this project.
please remember that in the event of an accident or other consequences, fill with your choice of this object is a shared responsibility and leave it to investors and operators.
Please review our concerns and expect to finally written answers to our questions.
Sincerely K. Pierstorf