Old Travel Trailerpropane

biogas plant in Güstrow - It is not gold that glitters

is positive here is no manure used. What to do with her?

Why is one part to the need delivery of agricultural products within a radius of 50 km and in monoculture of 1 and 10% in Mecklenburg? If this transport in the frame? The question is not answered or wrong.

Disneycruise Audition

4 small biogas plants

What have we achieved?
first This year will be built no more BGA.
second Next year, probably not, that is a permanent road (at a big investment, they must be built) and there is everything the same. Additional traffic only to the small BGA (500 MW) to supply and disposal.
probably has a little smaller risks, but in peak (1 MW plant) there was a danger for the village (600 inhabitants).
According to Building Code (see below) are probably not all conditions (manure = 8 km away and too close to residential development) is satisfied for Kaltenhof. I also doubt
that he can finance 4 systems (situation of financial crisis of banks).

Acute Rash Hiv Long Last

This is democracy Dassower of Representatives


notwithstanding this memory of past comments about the responsibility to the citizens decided against representatives of the people here called for the construction of the biogas plant. Were indeed only 648 signatures. Waiter said yes and that it would not be many more by far ... that many would have signed it out of ignorance, that is now a different opinion and other information. And there are "no" arguments that speak against the BGA.

Pokemon Sur Cydia Source

Still the breakdown in Saxony, Saxony Nemt

How To Make Paint For A Cake

breakdown in Nemt

Where's Power Steering Pump On Silverado

Legal ...

plays in Dassow the Building Code probably does not matter.
Where are the stables? In
Pötenitz in Kalkhorst in Mallentin, in East Holstein ...
is therefore Kaltenhof off the hook at 500 MW?
The farmstead = a plant that is 4 x 500MW units would not be feasible.

STVO
"A lowered
sidewalk may only be loaded with 2.8 tons
."

The plant is about 260 meters from here

from the nearest building

Interesting Tricks With 35mm Film

OZ 08.09.08 - biogas plant or a biogas plant height

A huge relationships Dassower for industrial plant (4.65 MW) or 4 small plants (500 MW)? that is the question ...
The city representatives prefer a large, ie they "want" to approve his project to the entrepreneur. For one, because it partially (ie not all) are afraid to get such a front of his own door, the other as friendship and perhaps in the hope that it will jump out something for the city.
jump from the investor EVONIK, the farmer must have come up with something.
Can he really afford to investor without four of such plants?
What's This? Make money, to sell agricultural products ...?
Kaltenhof will probably have to put up such a plant.
has no influence on the operation (see previous comments!).
But the risk will hopefully lower (small complex, although any checks on the content and nature of the filling) and a disaster would follow an investigation and that the operator be held liable.

disappointing is the behavior of city officials who have not the courage to react against the behavior of this operator. For years, he can do with them what he wants. Eg the farmhouse Kaltenhof he bought with the promise to repair it (after two years paid after a warning, now it is boarded up), works it blocks, because of their own projects, constant violations of traffic rules, you get almost all enforced (roads, BGA. .. without something in return the city to return) and its attachments, fields, etc are in a state ...


(See picture and this is an image with good light!) Neglected, abandoned buildings from the GDR era (housing estate that would not even approved for livestock.)

Combat Action Badge For All Wars

Güstrow Insane - Despite resistance to build the biggest biogas plant in Europe Güstrow OZ 04./05.10.08

Who pays the costs the investment? the taxpayer who pays the
rising energy prices? What happens when the customer
crop failures, drought, etc?
What happens in an accident?
How safe is this investment?
Why take the criticism seriously? If the citizens do not deserve that their concerns seriously?
Such plants:
- Away from the villages!
- build your own access roads to relieve the traffic!
- Do not use food!

How To Install Port Royale 2

Lübeck news for decision in terms of biogas plant in Dassow Kaltenhof


The operator wrote to the mayor and city representatives an email with conscious "decision support".
content like this: "If the city officials do not agree to this project in Kaltenhof he would 4 x 500 MW units at 4 locations (so to speak, in all major villages, home to city officials) to build this would not be." Decision agents "and thus would get 4 places per BGA with consequences, that is. noise, odor, traffic and all the risks this "Decision support", he manipulated the decision and laughed up his sleeve. The lack of courage of the city officials to decide against the operator is shameful. Now we will see what they have achieved. As long as the operator wanted something, he "loved" kept quiet and now he is back, "Do whatever he wants." No one can and dares him to stop. Afterwards, everything is thrown to him.
Operators in Dassow see things differently. They support the idea of the project, renewable energy, investment, etc., but they also criticize the operator and his work. Ie, land run down, not cleaned up and nothing invested and now everything is better? Those who believe it ...
If the road along the object or changed?
Now you can still get something out of the city and residents (urban development contract). It is up to the city representatives ... The investments are now, either they play with or adjust.

Compressed Air Can Duster India

It appears that the decision has to be Ostseezeitung 04./05.10.08

The discussion of city officials: instead of 648 is the number of residents who oppose the location of the BGA, reduced to 600. Then it does not matter whether or why they are against the project. Mr. Blanchard (according to the newspaper with his own opinion) agrees with the opinion of Mr. Ober. Man (men's) has dealt so intensively with the arguments was (always for the project, ran for the operator always started right away) and just closes his eyes and sees no more arguments that speak against a BGA (increased traffic, odor, noise, risks, rising prices for energy and food ... the smells of nepotism). Own arguments, as no more manure transport, have been refuted. "Therefore, the manure hit by the stables" Who has the operator in control? Until now, sewage sludge, where he was also intended to give no more. Should he be fermented with? The operator
contradicts itself again and again: first it is, is the panacea Pellez = no longer financially viable to 2009 and still being built, where before 2009 can not be produced?
Planning is also contradictory. They want to alleviate the traffic problem and the success is low. Initial attempts to traffic from the agricultural and Brennereiweg Klützer keep St., then to lead it through the day 21 runs Pellez Klützer road. Brennereiweg allegedly attributable to the more funding that must be repaid expected. Has anyone really been asked or is that just politics, a means of pressure. What then? So there are going to continue through the Brenereiweg because we (ie the city) is bankruptcy. A nerve! The citizens have paid the street, pro rata, and the farmer a cent. So, the operator could also something "GIVE" and not only demand and claim. No residents have needed a 40-tonne road and is now that the city has no money, will again have to pay? Are they still continued to be sold to citizens continue to betray and handled ...?
Does the city have learned nothing from the CD drive. As the "big one" policy, always blow money and again after paying the bran man